Last edited by Mikakinos
Thursday, May 14, 2020 | History

4 edition of Mixed Motives, Uncertain Outcomes found in the catalog.

Mixed Motives, Uncertain Outcomes

Defense Conversion in China

  • 167 Want to read
  • 15 Currently reading

Published by Lynne Rienner Publishers .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • Political ideologies,
  • Industries - General,
  • Defense Industries,
  • Political Science,
  • Business / Economics / Finance,
  • Politics/International Relations,
  • Military planning,
  • China,
  • General,
  • Defenses

  • Edition Notes

    ContributionsJorn Brommelhorster (Editor), John Frankenstein (Editor)
    The Physical Object
    FormatHardcover
    Number of Pages275
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL8575843M
    ISBN 101555877109
    ISBN 109781555877101

      Put another way, the defendant loses unless the bad motive made some kind of causal difference in outcomes. While this approach is intuitive, I argue that the But-For standard is problematic. The widespread acceptance of the But-For standard is the most important failure in our jurisprudence of mixed motives. This casebook presents both classic and current cases in bioethics, as well as the biomedical and social framework needed to understand the moral and social issues they raise. The text draws its cases from the author's market leading text, INTERVENTION AND REFLECTION, 6th Edition, and provides up-to-date introductions and a strong theoretical foundation for the critical study of bioethics.

    Negotiation is a mixed-motive enterprise, which refers to the fact that parties: have incentives to cooperate as well as compete A key reason why buisness people need negotiation skills is due to the increased specialization of skills. One of these factors was a person's personality. Some people might characteristically adopt one of the orientations in most situations. This would influence their actions in mixed-motive conflict situations, such as the Prisoner's Dilemma Game, resource dilemmas, and public goods dilemmas.

    In book: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Theory in Psychology, Vol. 2, Publisher: Sage, pp (i.e., both persons want the same outcome) no tension exists, and motives like cooperation. and. Mixed-motive games. This paper will consider two-player mixed motive games with the generic structure shown in Matrix 1. Each player, (Player 1 and Player 2) has a choice of two actions: C or ing on the combination of actions chosen by both players, Player 1 is assigned a payoff value V 1 and Player 2 is assigned a payoff value V 2. V 1 and V 2 can have values of T, R, P, or S.


Share this book
You might also like
The silent one

The silent one

Public housing child care demonstration program

Public housing child care demonstration program

England and the English

England and the English

Forgotten Horrors

Forgotten Horrors

Troubled lives

Troubled lives

Transfer of powder and unserviceable explosives to the Department of Agriculture

Transfer of powder and unserviceable explosives to the Department of Agriculture

Bryant co-ordinated construction with Byson wall frame system for high flats.

Bryant co-ordinated construction with Byson wall frame system for high flats.

Shimmy a birch

Shimmy a birch

Selected Quotations for the Ideological Skeptic

Selected Quotations for the Ideological Skeptic

Mirror of your mind.

Mirror of your mind.

Teaching arithmetic in the modern school

Teaching arithmetic in the modern school

History of papermaking in the Pacific Northwest

History of papermaking in the Pacific Northwest

senior management team and managerial culture in a grammar school.

senior management team and managerial culture in a grammar school.

New age movement

New age movement

DEEP 67

DEEP 67

Mixed Motives, Uncertain Outcomes Download PDF EPUB FB2

The Hardcover of the Mixed Motives, Uncertain Outcomes: Defense Conversion in China by Jorn Brommelhorster at Barnes & Noble. FREE Shipping on $35 or Due to COVID Pages: COVID Resources. Reliable information about the coronavirus (COVID) is available from the World Health Organization (current situation, international travel).Numerous and frequently-updated resource results are available from this ’s WebJunction has pulled together information and resources to assist library staff as they consider how to handle coronavirus.

Mixed Motives, Uncertain Outcomes looks critically at China's efforts to adapt its vast military- industrial complex to the service of its socialist market economy. The authors—all of whom have witnessed or participated first-hand in the country's defense conversion—offer political, macroeconomic, business, and military perspectives on this complex issue.

Mixed motives, uncertain outcomes: defense conversion in China. [Jörn Brömmelhörster;] Home. WorldCat Home About WorldCat Help.

Search. Search Book, Internet Resource: All Authors / Contributors: Jörn Brömmelhörster. Find more information about: ISBN: X This book combines foundational constructions in the theory of motives and results relating motivic cohomology to more explicit constructions.

Prerequisite for understanding the work is a basic background in algebraic geometry. The author constructs and describes a triangulated category of mixed motives over an arbitrary base s: 1. Mixed Motives book.

Read 6 reviews from the world's largest community for readers. When Mary's sister is late to come home one night, she doesn't think t /5(6). The Supreme Court first recognized the mixed-motive theory in Price Waterhouse v.

Hopkins, where the Court held, in a plurality opinion, that a plaintiff could shift the burden of proof to the employer to prove an affirmative defense upon a showing that the Mixed Motives characteristic "'played a motivating part in an employment decision.'"Author: LandMark Publications.

Mixed Motives 5 later use, we also give some details on associated cubical versions of these complexes. The relation of the Zariski cohomology of Gm to K0 and K1 was well- known from the very beginning: the Picard group H1(XZar;Gm) appears as a quotient of the reduced K0 and the group of global units H0(XZar;Gm) is likewise a quotient of K1(X), both via a determinant mapping.

The conjectural theory of mixed motives would be a universal cohomology theory in arithmetic algebraic geometry. The monograph describes the approach to motives via their well-defined realizations.

This includes a review of several known cohomology theories. The purpose of this book is to collect the fundamental results for decision making under uncertainty in one place, much as the book by Puterman [] on Markov decision processes did for Markov decision process theory.

In partic-ular, the aim is to give a uni ed account of algorithms and theory for sequential. Discerning the motives that lead businesspeople to make ethical decisions in economic contexts is important, for it aids the moral evaluation of such decisions.

But conventional economic theory has for too long assumed an egoist model of motivation, to which many contrast an altruist view of ethical choices. The result is to see business decision making as implying dilemmas.

triangulated version of mixed motives in which one could hope to nd the more involved theory of abelian mixed motives through the concept of t-structures. This hoped for theory was conjecturally described by Beilinson in [Be 87, ] under the name of motivic complexes.

Gender and creation of value in mixed-motive negotiation Article in International Journal of Conflict Management 20(3) July with 38 Reads How we measure 'reads'. The relations that could or should exist between algebraic cycles, algebraic K-theory, and the cohomology of - possibly singular - varieties, are the topic of investigation of this book.

The author proceeds in an axiomatic way, combining the concepts of twisted Poincaré duality theories, weights, and tensor categories. Laboratory Experiments in the Social Sciences summarizes how to design and conduct scientifically sound experiments, be they from surveys, interviews, observations, or experimental methods.

The book encompasses how to collect reliable data, the appropriate uses of different methods, and how to avoid or resolve common problems in experimental. Game Theory and Experimental Games: The Study of Strategic Interaction is a critical survey of the essential ideas of game theory and the findings of empirical research on strategic interaction.

Some experiments using lifelike simulations of familiar kinds of strategic interactions are presented, and applications of game theory to the study of. All of the following are included in our text book's definition of interpersonal conflict EXC usually harmful and best if avoided.

Tyra wants a dog, and Lance wants a cat, but their apartment is only big enough for one pet, and they can't afford both anyway.

Mixed-motive negotiations are strategically, socially, and motivationally complex. Theorists argue that multiparty negotiations exacerbate these complexities leading to inefficient outcomes. Social motives influence negotiators’ actions and reactions. In this study we propose and test hypotheses about the relationships between negotiators’ motives, their persistence in use of integrative and distributive strategies, and individual outcomes in four-person mixed-motive negotiations.

Cooperative negotiators in this multi-party setting engaged in more integrative and less. The present work extends this model to the case of vague mixed report results of a new experiment where 40 DMs used two methods (direct judgments of numerical CEs, and inferred CEs.

The Supreme Court majority disagreed regarding mixed motive. Strictly interpreting Title VII’s and its amendments’ plain language, it found that mixed motive claims pertain only to “status discrimination” under Title VII, that is, discrimination claims based on race.

The book is a good primer to understand more about geopolitical conflicts, wars, the dynamics between leaders and using game theory to determine potential outcomes. The book was interesting and had a lot of useful information.4/5(45).C.

Mixed-Motives Coordination Games (“Battle of the Sexes” Games) Whereas in pure coordination games players have the same preference ordering over the game outcomes, in mixed-motives games the players differ with respect to the equilibrium they prefer (although they prefer ending up on the equilibrium they dislike to reaching a.